Effects of ChatGPT on students’ academic performance in Pakistan higher education classrooms
Roumeliotis, K. I. & Tselikas, N. D. ChatGPT and open-AI models: A preliminary review. Future Internet. 15, 192 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cheung, S. K., Kwok, L. F., Phusavat, K. & Yang, H. H. Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Educational Technol. High. Educ. 18, 1–9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A. & Valverde, P. Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. (2019).
Mhlanga, D. Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. Education, the Responsible and Ethical Use of ChatGPT Towards Lifelong Learning (2023).
Mishra, P., Warr, M. & Islam, R. TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. J. Digit. Learn. Teacher Educ. 39, 235–251 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 71, 102642 (2023).
Latif, E. et al. Artificial general intelligence (AGI) for education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12479 (2023).
Gill, S. S. et al. Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet Things Cyber-Physical Syst. 4, 19–23 (2024).
Google Scholar
Onal, S. & Kulavuz-Onal, D. A. cross-disciplinary examination of the instructional uses of ChatGPT in higher education. J. Educ. Technol. Syst., 00472395231196532 (2023).
Haleem, A., Javaid, M. & Singh, R. P. An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Evaluations. 2, 100089 (2022).
Google Scholar
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S. & Khan, I. H. Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Evaluations. 3, 100115 (2023).
Google Scholar
Domenech, J. In 9th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’23). IEEE.
Rasul, T. et al. The role of ChatGPT in higher education: benefits, challenges, and future research directions. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 6 (2023).
Limo, F. A. F. et al. Personalized tutoring: ChatGPT as a virtual tutor for personalized learning experiences. Social Space. 23, 293–312 (2023).
Wu, T. T., Lee, H. Y., Li, P. H., Huang, C. N. & Huang, Y. M. Promoting self-regulation progress and knowledge construction in blended learning via ChatGPT-based learning aid. J. Educational Comput. Res. 61, 3–31 (2024).
Google Scholar
Firaina, R. & Sulisworo, D. Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: frequency and impact on productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia. 2, 39–46 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rudolph, J., Tan, S. & Tan, S. ChatGPT: bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 6 (2023).
Hunter-Johnson, Y., Liu, T., Murray, K., Niu, Y. & Suprise, M. Higher education as a tool for veterans in transition: battling the challenges. J. Continuing High. Educ. 69, 1–18 (2021).
Google Scholar
Elbanna, S. & Armstrong, L. Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future. Manage. Sustain. Arab. Rev. (2023).
Shihab, S. R., Sultana, N. & Samad, A. Revisiting the use of ChatGPT in business and educational fields: possibilities and challenges. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu. 2, 534–545 (2023).
Roy, D. & Putatunda, T. From textbooks to chatbots: integrating AI in english literature classrooms of India. J. e-Learning Knowl. Soc. 19, 65–73 (2023).
Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., Refae, E., Chabchoub, H. & G. A. & Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT—A case study. Cogent Educ. 10, 2210461 (2023).
Google Scholar
Karakas, A. In Transforming the Language Teaching Experience in the Age of AI 215–233 (IGI Global, 2023).
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R. & Gerardou, F. S. Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Educ. Sci. 13, 856 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P. & Papin, K. Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementation in education. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 34, 313–338 (2023).
Ahmad, T. Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. High. Educ. Skills Work-Based Learn. 10, 217–238 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, T. et al. Exploring the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on international students in higher education: generative AI, chatbots, analytics, and international student success. Appl. Sci. 13, 6716 (2023).
Google Scholar
Aithal, P. & Aithal, S. Application of ChatGPT in higher education and Research–A futuristic analysis. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Manage. Lett. (IJAEML). 7, 168–194 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ullah, R., Ismail, H. B., Khan, M. T. I. & Zeb, A. Nexus between chat GPT usage dimensions and investment decisions making in Pakistan: moderating role of financial literacy. Technol. Soc. 76, 102454 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zeb, A., Ullah, R. & Karim, R. Exploring the role of ChatGPT in higher education: opportunities, challenges and ethical considerations. Int. J. Inform. Learn. Technol. 41, 99–111. (2024).
Google Scholar
Casheekar, A., Lahiri, A., Rath, K., Prabhakar, K. S. & Srinivasan, K. A contemporary review on chatbots, AI-powered virtual conversational agents, ChatGPT: applications, open challenges and future research directions. Comput. Sci. Rev. 52, 100632 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hua, S., Jin, S. & Jiang, S. The limitations and ethical considerations of Chatgpt. Data Intell. 6, 201–239 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Sheng, D., Zhou, Z. & Wu, Y. AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content. Humanit. Social Sci. Commun. 11, 1–14 (2024).
Google Scholar
Petrič, G. Everyone talks everything with ChatGPT: students’ uses of ChatGPT and their impact on learning performance. Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. (IJTHI). 20, 1–22 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dillon, A. et al. The use of large Language model tools such as ChatGPT in academic writing in english medium education postgraduate programs: A grounded theory approach. J. Educators Online. 21, n2 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rasul, T. et al. The role of ChatGPT in higher education: benefits, challenges, and future research directions. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 6, 41–56 (2023).
Shloul, A. T. et al. Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students’ performance in education. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 100219 (2024).
Dahri, N. A. et al. Investigating AI-based academic support acceptance and its impact on students’ performance in Malaysian and Pakistani higher education institutions. Educ. Inform. Technol., 1–50 (2024).
Shah, M. H. A., Ali, Z. & Shah, A. Challenging factors towards the effective use of ChatGPT in education in Province Sindh, Pakistan: application of TAM model. Int. J. Acad. Res. Humanit. 4, 86–94 (2024).
Amjad, A. I., Aslam, S. & Tabassum, U. Tech-infused classrooms: A comprehensive study on the interplay of mobile learning, ChatGPT and social media in academic attainment. Eur. J. Educ. 59, e12625 (2024).
Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results 291 thesis, Cambridge, (1986).
Sorce, J. & Issa, R. R. Extended technology acceptance model (TAM) for adoption of information and communications technology (ICT) in the US construction industry. J. Inform. Technol. Constr. 26 (2021).
Isaac, O., Abdullah, Z., Ramayah, T. & Mutahar, A. M. Internet usage within government institutions in Yemen: an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) with internet self-efficacy and performance impact. Sci. Int. 29, 737–747 (2017).
Sharma, S. & Yadav, R. Chat GPT–A technological remedy or challenge for education system. Global J. Enterp. Inform. Syst. 14, 46–51 (2022).
Abuhassna, H. et al. Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. Int. J. Educational Technol. High. Educ. 17, 1–23 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. & Li, S. Opportunities and challenges in the application of ChatGPT in foreign Language teaching. Int. J. Educ. Social Sci. Res. 6, 75–89 (2023).
Google Scholar
Aldossari, M. Q. & Sidorova, A. Consumer acceptance of internet of things (IoT): smart home context. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 60, 507–517 (2020).
Phan, T. N., Ho, T. V. & Le-Hoang, P. V. Factors affecting the behavioral intention and behavior of using E–Wallets of youth in Vietnam. J. Asian Finance Econ. Bus. (JAFEB). 7, 295–302 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chao, C. M. Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: an application and extension of the UTAUT model. Front. Psychol. 10, 1652 (2019).
Google Scholar
Alshahrani, A. The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: current trends and future research directions. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 7, 2029–2040 (2023).
Google Scholar
Al-Yaqoobi, N. S. S. & Tan, M. I. B. I. The technology acceptance model theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). IJASOS-International E-J. Adv. Social Sci. 7, 645–653 (2021).
Rane, N. L., Choudhary, S. P., Tawde, A. & Rane, J. ChatGPT is not capable of serving as an author: ethical concerns and challenges of large Language models in education. Int. Res. J. Modernization Eng. Technol. Sci. 5, 851–874 (2023).
Bower, M., DeWitt, D. & Lai, J. W. Reasons associated with preservice teachers’ intention to use immersive virtual reality in education. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 51, 2215–2233 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A. & Balta, N. Student attitudes towards chat GPT: A technology acceptance model survey. Int. Educational Rev. 1, 57–83 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chang, Y. W., Hsu, P. Y., Chen, J., Shiau, W. L. & Xu, N. Utilitarian and/or hedonic shopping–consumer motivation to purchase in smart stores. Industrial Manage. Data Syst. 123, 821–842 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ma, X. & Huo, Y. Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework. Technol. Soc. 75, 102362 (2023).
Google Scholar
Junior, W. G., Marasco, E., Kim, B., Behjat, L. & Eggermont, M. How ChatGPT can inspire and improve serious board game design. Int. J. Serious Games. 10, 33–54 (2023).
Google Scholar
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. Modeling students’ perceptions of chatbots in learning: integrating technology acceptance with the Value-Based adoption model. Educ. Sci. 13, 1151 (2023).
Google Scholar
Iandoli, L. Annual review Article: the dual mindset of design-driven entrepreneurship: the case for a pedagogy of making and artefact-centred entrepreneurship education. Int. Small Bus. J. 41, 349–370 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jo, H. Understanding AI tool engagement: A study of ChatGPT usage and word-of-mouth among university students and office workers. Telematics Inform. 85, 102067 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gundu, T. in International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance. 418–431 (Springer).
De Guinea, A. O. & Markus, M. L. Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Q., 433–444 (2009).
Butarbutar, R., Ruing, F. H., Basri, N., Tuharea, V. U. & Leba, S. M. R. Unpacking online collaborative learning in teaching EFL speaking: insights from three rural area case studies. Qualitative Rep. 28, 3379–3401 (2023).
Muftić, F., Kadunić, M., Mušinbegović, A. & Abd Almisreb, A. Exploring medical breakthroughs: A systematic review of ChatGPT applications in healthcare. Southeast. Europe J. Soft Comput. 12, 13–41 (2023).
Yu, H. Reflection on whether chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Front. Psychol. 14, 1181712 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kumar Sharma, A. & Sharma, R. The role of generative pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) in revolutionising digital marketing: A conceptual model. J. Cult. Mark. Strategy. 8, 80–92 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2, 314–324 (2020).
Google Scholar
Saif, N. et al. Chat-GPT; validating technology acceptance model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Comput. Hum. Behav., 108097 (2023).
Tayan, O., Hassan, A., Khankan, K. & Askool, S. Considerations for adapting higher education technology courses for AI large Language models: A critical review of the impact of ChatGPT. Mach. Learn. Appl., 100513 (2023).
Aithal, P. & Aithal, S. Optimizing the use of artificial intelligence-powered Gpts as teaching and research assistants by professors in higher education institutions: a study on smart utilization. Int. J. Manage. Technol. Social Sci. 8, 368–401 (2023).
Exintaris, B., Karunaratne, N. & Yuriev, E. Metacognition and critical thinking: using ChatGPT-Generated responses as prompts for critique in a problem-solving workshop (SMARTCHEMPer). J. Chem. Educ. 100, 2972–2980 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tsai, M. L., Ong, C. W. & Chen, C. L. Exploring the use of large Language models (LLMs) in chemical engineering education: Building core course problem models with Chat-GPT. Educ. Chem. Eng. 44, 71–95 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jacobi, L. The structure of discussions in an online communication course: what do students find most effective? J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 14, 11 (2017).
Stephenson, N. S. & Sadler-McKnight, N. P. Developing critical thinking skills using the science writing heuristic in the chemistry laboratory. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 17, 72–79 (2016).
Google Scholar
Adarkwah, M. A., Ying, C., Mustafa, M. Y. & Huang, R. in International Conference on Smart Learning Environments. 117–126 (Springer).
Lian, Y., Tang, H., Xiang, M. & Dong, X. Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China: A text mining analysis based on social media. Technol. Soc. 76, 102442 (2024).
Google Scholar
Quintana, C. et al. In Scaffolding 337–386 ( Psychology Press, 2018).
Song, C. & Song, Y. Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted Language learning for EFL students. Front. Psychol. 14 (2023).
Huallpa, J. J. Exploring the ethical considerations of using chat GPT in university education. Periodicals Eng. Nat. Sci. 11, 105–115 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ali, A. Exploring the transformative potential of technology in overcoming educational disparities. Int. J. Multidisciplinary Sci. Arts 2 (2023).
Foroughi, B. et al. Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: findings from PLS-SEM and FsQCA. Int. J. Human–Computer Interact. 40, 4501–4520 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dash, G. & Paul, J. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 173, 121092 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ma, L., Yao, H. & Hou, J. Exploring the relationship between supervisor support and anxiety of graduate students in China: the mediating role of scientific research efficacy. Asia-Pacific Educ. Researcher. 33, 321–329 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zeb, A., Gan, G. G. G., Wei, O. J. & Karim, R. Examining the nexus between situational factors and job performance through the mediating role of work engagement and self-efficacy. J. Public. Affairs. 24, e2915 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ashraf, M. A., Sahar, N., Kamran, M. & Alam, J. Impact of self-efficacy and perfectionism on academic procrastination among university students in Pakistan. Behav. Sci. 13, 537 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hafaiedh, A. B. Research ethics for social scientists: between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance by mark Israel and lain hay. Int. Social Sci. J. 60, 467–472. (2009).
Google Scholar
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. Research methods for business students eight edition. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. (2019).
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. & Thiele, K. O. Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45, 616–632 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zuo, H., Zeb, A. & Ismail, F. & Bin Othayman, M. Transformational leadership: enhancing corporate entrepreneurship for fostering competitiveness. J. Competitiveness 16 (2024).
Mah, W. L., Ali, N. A. & Zawawi, D. Assessing validity of sources of innovation, innovation and firm performance for variance-based structural equation modelling. Int. J. Acc. 3, 71–87 (2018).
Saif, N. et al. Chat-GPT; validating technology acceptance model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Comput. Hum. Behav. 154, 108097 (2024).
Google Scholar
Song, C. & Song, Y. Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted Language learning for EFL students. Front. Psychol. 14, 1260843 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zeb, A., Rehman, F. U., Bin Othayman, M. & Rabnawaz, M. Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT are fostering knowledge sharing, ethics, academia and libraries. Int. J. Inform. Learn. Technol. 42(1), 67–83 (2025).
Google Scholar
link
