Myths About Passive Investment
There is a big amount of false info that’s been circulating about the subject of active and passive investment. That’s to be expected for a debate that’s been raging for quite a long time. Aside from that, there is also much on the line from salaries of fund managers to retiree’s savings. What’s unfortunate for investors is that, it is not possible to try out other investment opportunities. Instead, it is requiring a great deal of great deal of analysis and research to choose a strategy. Regardless if you are rooting for active or passive, it is extremely important that you make yourself aware of the facts from fiction in order to come up with a well informed decision to how you can invest your hard earned money in the best way possible.
To help refining the debate between the two subjects, here are facts that have to be cleared up regarding passive investment.
Number 1. There is no action – if just passive investing was as simple as placing money in index fund and wait for all money to roll in. Well the truth is, passive investors can actually be performers of portfolio observation, discipline and construction.
When you are developing a portfolio along with passive investments like index funds, the action starts by allocating money in a strategic manner among varieties of asset classes that helps in achieving long term financial goal. If those allocations change, more action is to be found with the passive investor particularly to those who rebalance their portfolio diligently by making trades return to assets back in their original level.
Number 2. Passive investing attains returns that are below market averages – it is true that primarily because of the cost but, average returns are in the eye of investors. The index funds seek to replicate market index so by that, even if they do so accurately, it’ll be below average for net of fees. Index funds on the other hand typically have lower costs than active funds meaning, they have better probabilities to get near market averages for a longer period of time.
Active funds are charging higher fees as well for personnel to do research and trades which eats away at returns as well as contribute to abysmal historical record of either matching or beating market averages.
Number 3. Passive investing is deemed as cookie-cutter strategy – detractors of passive investment believe that it could not beat its counterpart or active investments since they’re not managed tactfully to change with market swings or to take advantage of future events. Actually, there is a benefit from uniformity of passive investing because the same strategy may be applied from one investor to the other.